Killer Instinct by S.E. Green

Killer Instinct by S.E. GreenKiller Instinct by S. E. Green
Genre: Thriller
Release Date: 6th May 2014
Publisher: Simon Pulse
Source: Publisher
Add it: Goodreads
Rating: one-star

She’s not evil, but she has certain... urges.

Lane is a typical teenager. Loving family. Good grades. Afterschool job at the local animal hospital. Martial arts enthusiast. But her secret obsession is studying serial killers. She understands them, knows what makes them tick.


Because she might be one herself.

Lane channels her dark impulses by hunting criminals—delivering justice when the law fails. The vigilantism stops shy of murder. But with each visceral rush the line of self-control blurs.
And then a young preschool teacher goes missing. Only to return... in parts.
When Lane excitedly gets involved in the hunt for “the Decapitator,” the vicious serial murderer that has come to her hometown, she gets dangerously caught up in a web of lies about her birth dad and her own dark past. And once the Decapitator contacts Lane directly, Lane knows she is no longer invisible or safe. Now she needs to use her unique talents to find the true killer’s identity before she—or someone she loves—becomes the next victim...

This book has the dubious honour of being the most unpleasant read that I’ve had to force myself to finish so far this year. Let me tell you why in one sentence: this book hates women. And I don’t mean that lightly; it really, really hates women.

The basic plot is clearly influenced by the current popularity of anti-heroes and gory crime drama because our protagonist, Lane, is a sociopathic teenage girl who casually talks about wanting to become a murderer in the same breath she uses to call her sister a slut. Which happens often. Lane exhibits all the textbook traits of what the media presents as a killer – she’s aloof to the point of having only one long-distance friend, is incredibly intelligent and obviously has an unhealthy interest in murders. So an infamous serial killer surfaces again in Lane’s hometown and because of reasons develops an interest in Lane herself, texting her and sending her graphic videos of his kills. Lane decides that, instead of telling her FBI mother and father, she can handle this on her own and I have questions to raise about this:

1. Lane’s mother and father are FBI higher-ups, with Lane’s mother heading the Behavioural Analysis unit, meaning they have years of experience in and out of the field and yet apparently they can’t tell that their daughter is hiding something? Or more importantly that she’s a complete sociopath?

2. Lane is supposedly intelligent and educated but displays very little of this in the book. Why on earth would anyone ever respond to a serial killer texting them or open files sent to them, I don’t understand. Also, despite her endlessly arrogant opinions about how great she is at serial killer 101, Lane can’t seem to put obvious clues together. Why is this book the way it is.

The women-hating thing, let’s talk about it. Right, so Lane is described as boyish and is presented as masculine – she has a flat chest, dresses androgynously and doesn’t care about the things those other girls care about because she is a special snowflake. I need to point out that she is deliberately presented as masculine within the text because every other female character is called a myriad of slurs – Lane’s sister Daisy is sexually active so Lane refers to her as a ‘slut’ and passes deeply insulting remarks about her sister’s skill at handjobs and blowjobs. Another character, Belinda, who has been in and out of rehab is described as unhinged, jealous and petty – Lane assaults her and upon finding out that Belinda went to her ex-boyfriend for help, calls her a ‘typically helpless female’. During the aftermath of an arson attack on a family Lane doesn’t even bloody know, the mother commits suicide – Lane’s opinion on the matter is that the mother should’ve just been one of the killer’s victims instead because that would kill two birds with one stone. Obviously the killer’s victims are all female and die in gruesome ways with Lane talking about how unnatural grief is towards these unknown victims because this book HATES WOMEN. Lane’s only friend is a girl called Reggie, who again is androgynous. Both these girls are sexually active but apparently don’t care for sex so are better than those other girls who enjoy their sexual sides. God forbid a girl be sexually active and enjoy it.

Amongst a number of other weird shit that happens, including Lane’s stint as Batman (again, masculine) in which she becomes a masked vigilante, the final twist to the book is both awful and indicative of the underlying theme that all women are to be hated. It’s a twist that doesn’t make sense narratively and thus only happens so that the book could have a shocking reveal right at the end. Do you want to read a book with the same kind of storyline but without the visceral hatred of women and poor narrative choices? Read The Naturals by Jennifer Lynn Barnes. Go pick up the first season of Criminal Minds; watch Dexter. Just don’t read this book.

4 comments on “Killer Instinct by S.E. Green

  1. Natalie 23/04/2014 12:36 pm

    The concept is cool enough.

    But ugh, gross. Thanks for the warning.

  2. Jessica @ Rabid Reads 23/04/2014 1:22 pm

    Yeah, I think I’ll stick to Dexter. Female-hating is negative fun, gruesome is gruesome, and tossing in a makes-not-one-lick-of-sense finale for the sake of being shocking . . . NOPE. And yeah, thanks for the warning b/c the blurb makes it sound kind of cool (which it obviously isn’t).

  3. Kelly 26/04/2014 3:32 pm

    The blurb sounds so good, it’s a shame that Green was so focused on hating women. Why not just make his protagonist male and be done with it?

  4. Natalie S. @ Books of a Feather 27/04/2014 6:53 pm

    I read another review that really disliked this book because it is a complete ripoff of Dexter Season 1, but yours definitely adds to my decision not to read it. I loathe books that have female protagonists that hate on other female characters for traditionally feminine attributes and their sexuality. Do they not see they are part of the problem?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.